<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>BWSI Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bwsi.com/blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bwsi.com/blog</link>
	<description>Staffing Industry Software</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 10:14:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Staffing and Cyber Security?</title>
		<link>http://www.bwsi.com/blog/staffing-and-cyber-security/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bwsi.com/blog/staffing-and-cyber-security/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 10:14:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Kinney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Customer Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bwsi.com/blog/?p=469</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BWSI, the developer of one of the industry’s leading staffing software packages, TempWizard, also does a fair amount of consulting in various capacities with our clients and even those who do not utilize our services. One issue we see with increasing &#8230; <a href="http://www.bwsi.com/blog/staffing-and-cyber-security/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BWSI, the developer of one of the industry’s leading <a href="http://www.bwsi.com" target="_blank">staffing software</a> packages, TempWizard, also does a fair amount of consulting in various capacities with our clients and even those who do not utilize our services. One issue we see with increasing frequency is the lack or total absence of cyber security—many businesses think because they have virus protection and a firewall that the issue is moot. Nothing could be further from the truth in my opinion given you can barely watch or read the news without some report of data theft, systems breaches, and outright cyber crime. A recent KPMG report titled <a href="http://www.kpmg.com/NL/en/Issues-And-Insights/ArticlesPublications/Documents/PDF/Risk-Consulting/The-five-most-common-cyber-security-mistakes.pdf" target="_blank">The five most common cyber security mistakes</a> is an excellent starting point for most organizations as it is written for the benefit of management who may not be familiar with all the acronyms and to give them confidence to ask the right questions of internal I.T. staff and consultants. Long and short of it: the time for action is NOW!</p>
<p>Cyber crime is a catch-all term that applies to a wide spectrum of illegal digital activities targeted at business in order to cause them harm—it could be financial, public relations, or industrial espionage. Let’s think about the data a staffing agency has at their fingertips—client and candidate lists which could be very valuable to a competitor, employee information which is invaluable for identity thieves and banking/direct deposit information. This is just a sampling of the exponential data growth most staffing agencies don’t quite realize happens daily in conjunction with the increase in sharing this data via online networks with other organizations. I won’t go into exhaustive detail of the report’s contents as it is very well written; however, I think two of its most important points are:</p>
<p>• Cyber security isn’t a department or budget item, but an attitude.</p>
<p>• 100% security isn’t feasible or even practical and it isn’t the appropriate goal.</p>
<p>As someone who has been in I.T. and software engineering since I was first published at 16 years old, the first bullet point above is the best phrasing I have read/heard on cyber security and should be an axiom for all companies and individuals. Cyber security should be based on a holistic approach, not just policies and procedures for the “boots on the ground” so to speak. It should go all the way to the company’s board and executive leadership demonstrating due diligence and effective management of risk. A security culture should permeate all facets of the organization empowering employees with the skills and knowledge for increased cyber security while still allowing them to function effectively and efficiently. No amount of money spent on technological solutions for cyber security will overcome a lack of awareness and embedded cultural change regarding cyber security processes.  BWSI encourages all readers and businesses to read the report and think about how to improve/implement cyber security measures throughout their organizations and lives.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bwsi.com/blog/staffing-and-cyber-security/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Massive Increase in I-9 Audits</title>
		<link>http://www.bwsi.com/blog/massive-increase-in-i-9-audits/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bwsi.com/blog/massive-increase-in-i-9-audits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 10:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Kinney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Documents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bwsi.com/blog/?p=465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am fortunate to work with users of our staffing software solutions as well as many in the staffing industry on many topics, but one of the issues that generate the most questions is the Form I-9 that is used &#8230; <a href="http://www.bwsi.com/blog/massive-increase-in-i-9-audits/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am fortunate to work with users of our <a href="http://www.bwsi.com " target="_blank">staffing software solutions</a> as well as many in the staffing industry on many topics, but one of the issues that generate the most questions is the Form I-9 that is used to verify employment eligibility. According to the most recent statistics, there were only three I-9 audits in 2004, 500 in 2008, and 3,004 (!) in 2012. You don’t have to be a math major to see the huge percentage increases in audits since 2004. It is critical to realize that the fines and penalties for procedural and substantive violations of the Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA), the law that outlines the policies and procedures regarding Form I-9, are nothing to mess around with and add up very quickly. As BWSI has written previously, each paperwork violation can have fines ranging from $110 to $1,100. If you knowingly violate IRCA, the penalties can range from $375 to $3,200 for a first offense of hiring an unauthorized employee.</p>
<p>I-9 audits are also not based on randomly targeting businesses, but look at companies that deal with food-service businesses, power plants, airports, and other areas that are critical to the nation’s functioning and operation. Another source of I-9 audits is disgruntled employees, and even though you may be doing everything right and following the letter of the law, it is up to you to prove it so during an audit. BWSI can’t emphasize enough that the Form I-9 isn’t anything to take lightly and you should have properly trained staff to process them and that staff should get refresher training at least once per year. The days of telling a new hire to “just bring in your driver’s license and social security card” are long gone and all businesses should make sure they are well informed on the latest guidance regarding Form I-9.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bwsi.com/blog/massive-increase-in-i-9-audits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PPACA Update &#8212; Notice Regarding Availability of Exchange Coverage</title>
		<link>http://www.bwsi.com/blog/ppaca-update-notice-regarding-availability-of-exchange-coverage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bwsi.com/blog/ppaca-update-notice-regarding-availability-of-exchange-coverage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 09:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Kinney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Human Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPACA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bwsi.com/blog/?p=460</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While many users of our staffing software, TempWizard, are still going through the calculations and strategic planning on how they are going to implement the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA), there is a provision that requires employers to &#8230; <a href="http://www.bwsi.com/blog/ppaca-update-notice-regarding-availability-of-exchange-coverage/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While many users of our <a href="http://www.bwsi.com" target="_blank">staffing software</a>, TempWizard, are still going through the calculations and strategic planning on how they are going to implement the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA), there is a provision that requires employers to provide notice to all employees regarding the availability of health coverage options through the state-based exchanges. Given that, even as of this writing, there is almost no firm information regarding these exchanges (recently rebranded “the Marketplace”), the Department of Labor delayed enforcement of the exchange notice provision (which was to begin on March 1, 2013).</p>
<p>On May 8, 2013, DOL issued temporary guidance in <a href="http://www.dol.gov/ebsa/newsroom/tr13-02.html " target="_blank">Technical Release 2013-02,</a> as well as model notices so employers have some idea what to include in the notices to employees regarding coverage options through the exchanges. Employers are now required to issue exchange coverage notices no later than October 1, 2013, relying on temporary guidance issued to date. Given that many parts of PPACA are still in a state of flux, expect additional guidance and changes to the model notices. This notice must be provided to ALL employees, regardless of their full-time or part-time status irrespective if the employee participates in the employer’s group health plan. For newly hired employees after October 1, 2013—again, regardless of status—the notice must be provided within 14 days of hire.</p>
<p>According to the guidance issued, an exchange coverage notice must include:</p>
<p>• Information about the existence of the exchange and how to contact the exchange.</p>
<p>• A description of services provided by the exchange.</p>
<p>• A statement regarding eligibility for subsidized exchange coverage if the employee obtains coverage through the exchange AND the employer’s plan fails to meet a 60% (bronze) minimum value standard.</p>
<p>• A statement that the employee may lose any employer contribution toward the cost of employer coverage (some of which may be excluded from federal income tax under a 125 plan) if the employee obtains coverage through the exchange.</p>
<p>The DOL created model exchange coverage notices for:</p>
<p>• Employers who <a href="http://www.dol.gov/ebsa/pdf/FLSAwithoutplans.pdf" target="_blank">do not offer a health plan </a></p>
<p>• Employers who <a href="http://www.dol.gov/ebsa/pdf/FLSAwithplans.pdf" target="_blank">do offer a health plan </a></p>
<p>BWSI recommends that all staffing industry companies and our clients start to plan for the implementation of the notification requirement, possibly including it with an employee’s new hire packet. Given the seemingly constant pace of change regarding all things PPACA, we would probably add something in mid to late August on your PPACA implementation schedule for planning and procedures regarding the exchange notification requirement.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bwsi.com/blog/ppaca-update-notice-regarding-availability-of-exchange-coverage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
